Overview of the three Different Leadership Styles-Free-Samples

Question: Write an essay defining, describing and comparing characteristics, including strengths and weaknesses of 3 leadership styles. Answer: Introduction: Leadership can be defined as the capability of an individual for influencing as well as guiding followers and members of the organization in achieving particular objectives set by the organization. This helps the employees develop a clear vision of the responsibilities expected from them as the leaders guide them by providing them knowledge, enhancing their skills and also supporting them with tools that help them in their development (DeHoogh et al., 2015). This assignment will mainly portray three different styles of leadership. It will also provide comparisons among the different leaderships styles with examples of leaders in the present generations. This will help in better understanding of the different styles properly. Overview of the three different leadership styles; One of the leadership styles that can be mentioned here is the autocratic leadership style. Here, the leaders take all the decisions and give very little scope to the employees for providing their suggestions. Leaders take all the decisions and do not participate in any consultation from the subordinates. The power mainly remains on the top and the subordinates in the bottom can only follow them. Those members who do not follow or agree with this kind of leaders are often punished to keep them in line (Mwenda Wachira, 2015). When any sort of mistakes take place, autocratic leaders try to set examples of the offenders by mainly punishing them in front of other employees. Blame is provided on the individuals even if the entire process of working is faulty without explaining (Iqbal, Anwar Haider, 2015). However, the next form of leadership that can be described is the transformational leadership. This is quite different from the autocratic leadership style, as they do not blame the em ployees in every failure. Rather they are seen to provide inspirational motivation. This involves the leaders in providing a vision of the future to the followers and at the same time motivating them for performing beyond expectations. Another very important feature of this style of leadership is that in this type, intellectual stimulation takes place of the old assumptions, traditions and beliefs by portraying novel and innovative thoughts for better performance from the employees (Banks et al., 2016). Unlike the autocratic leaders who are more concerned with the output rather than the requirements and needs of the employees, the transformational leaders believe in individualized considerations (McCleskey, 2014). The leaders remain highly concerned about the needs of the people and try their best to develop the skills of their followers for better achieving of the goals. Unlike the autocratic leaders, they do not put themselves in the topmost position and provide more importance on what is better for the organizations. This type of leaders provides a clear vision of the future that in turn helps in motivating staff members to perform beyond their expectations (Rouche et al., 2014). Another form of leadership is called the democratic leadership. Democratic leaders on the other hand are mainly seen to rely on different types of group inputs and consensus before they are trying to make a decision. Such leaders are seen to prefer an open discourse between the workforces (Teles, 2015). However, they make sure that although they prefer interacting with all at equal levels, they reserve the final say. This is different from the transformational leaders as the latter bases their leadership in motivating and inspiring people by describing how the different changes would be helpful in benefitting the organization before the transition initiates (Beerbobhm, 2015). Democratic leaders help the employees in different ways by giving them the responsibility, accountability a nd even feedback regarding their performance. This is also different from the autocratic leadership, as unlike autocratic leadership, leaders do not exploit power; rather the democratic leadership believes that relationships are very important in workplace. They place focus on the quality improvement of the different systems and processes rather than on different mistakes conducted by the individual team members. One of the best examples of an autocratic leader is the American entrepreneur called Martha Stewart. She is also a writer and a television personality. She is mainly the founder of the business empire called the Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (Shein, 2017) . She mainly helps people by guiding them in everyday living like cooking, entertaining, renovating of homes, gardening, holiday planning, pet, crafts and many other forms of healthy living. One of the examples of transformational leaders is Richard Branson. He is a self-made billionaire who has built an empire of 400 companies under the name of the Virgin group. This group includes bridal wear, banks, mobile phones, music, hotel chains, airlines and even pension plans. His company is one of the most recognized and respected brands in the world. One of the examples of democratic leaders is Indra Nooyi. She is the chairperson and CEO of Pepsico since the year 2006 and is still maintaining her position with pride. The Forbes has ran ked her as the thirteenth most powerful women in the world in 2014 (Williams, 2017). All of them are effective leaders although their leadership styles are very different. Martha shows autocratic leadership traits where she is excessively particular as well as demanding form her staff. Although she pays personal attention to every aspect of the business but never provides scope for her employees to participate in decision-making. One of her employee was quoted saying in the interviews that she treats employee as her commodity and never tries to understand the issues faced by them (Shein, 2017). Like a good leader, she has problem solving skills that she uses to operate a successful business and address various challenges that act as barrier in her connecting with her audience. However, she is perfectionists and cannot tolerate an employee who does show such traits of being perfect. She cannot handle any criticisms well from the employees and exhibit an overtly strict behavior to prevent criticisms. She also faces a huge difficulty in understanding others perspectives and is considered to be arrogant and distant from the employees working for her. She b elieves that her way of doing thing is only the right way and is often seen condescending other in every ways. She is very narcissistic and shows the impulsivity trait. However, such traits had helped her in ensuring productivity among employees even though her reinforcements are negative. Richard Branson on the other hand mainly believes that a great leader who is genuinely interested for the employee who works for him. Unlike Martha, who is highly concerned about the profit margin rather than the employees who works for her, Richard is seen to adopt different types of motivational strategies to bring out the best skills of the employees. He motivates people by stating that in order to bring success, employees should develop team-working skills and believe in themselves in whatever things they do. Researchers often describe him as people-oriented as he believes that praising has the power of changing game plans (Williams, 2017). He also believes that of if leaders can successfully promote the employees more than what they expect from the organization, the employees can excel. This is because if the leaders show them that he trusts in them, the employees become more confident in their task that brings out effective outcomes. Unlike Martha he believes in empowering empl oyees who therefore provide the best support in times of change and crisis of the company. Even he is seen to invite the employees and his families to his house parties making them feel respected and accepted by the organization. This is total opposite of the policy that is followed by Martha who uses fear for ensuring proper work. Indra Nooyi is a democratic leader who believes that equal and active participation of the employees would help in meeting the objectives of the organization. She maintains a proper relationship with the employees and even asks for their active participation through requests. She has been seen to write letters to their parents thanking them for their children. Such a gesture makes the employees happy (Saji, 2016). She looks upon all employees as equal participants and never distinguishes between them. Just like democratic leaders, she listens to opinions and considers all these opinions in the developing proper plans. However, she holds the authority to make the final decisions but at the same time tries to satisfy the needs of the employees (Northouse, 2017). However, unlike Branson, she is not seen in motivating employees with inspirational speeches. Rather she believes in empowering employees with equal participation and caring for them. Since, the time she became the CEO of Pepsi Co, important changes have been noticed which are high employee satisfaction, lower employee turnover and improved work conditions. From the entire discussion above, it becomes quite clear that different leaders have their own leadership styles that help the organization reach the zenith of success. Autocratic leader, like Martha Stewart likes keeping powers in her own hand and follows negative reinforcement as the way to manage employee performance. She does not like suggestions from her employees and treat them like commodities. This is completely opposite to that of the leadership style of Richard Branson who follows transformational leadership style. His motivational speeches and inspiring nature ensured him to have an empire of 400 organizations. Again, Indra Nooyi, CEO of PepsiCo is one of the examples of democratic leaders who believes in equal participation of the employees and introduces different ways to increase participation of employees in decision-making. She also solves their concerns and meets their needs. Therefore, different leaders have their own styles that have helped them to achieve success References: Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., Guler, C. E. (2016). A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy.The Leadership Quarterly,27(4), 634-652. Beerbohm, E. (2015). Is Democratic Leadership Possible?.American Political Science Review,109(4), 639-652. De Hoogh, A. H., Greer, L. L., Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? An investigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance.The Leadership Quarterly,26(5), 687-701. Iqbal, N., Anwar, S., Haider, N. (2015). Effect of leadership style on employee performance.Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review,5(5). McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,5(4), 117. Mwenda, L. K. M., Wachira, A. W. (2015). Effects of Leadership Styles on Implementation of Organization Strategic Plans in Small and Medium Enterprises in Nairobi. Northouse, P. G. (2017).Introduction to leadership: Concepts and practice. Sage Publications. Roueche, P. E., Baker III, G. A., Rose, R. R. (2014).Shared vision: Transformational leadership in American community colleges. Rowman Littlefield. Saji, T. G. (2016). Gender bias in corporate leadership: A comparison between indian and global firms.Effective Executive,19(4), 27. Shein, J. B. (2017). Corporate Governance at Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia: Not A Good Thing.Kellogg School of Management Cases, 1-23. Teles, F. (2015). The distinctiveness of democratic political leadership.Political Studies Review,13(1), 22-36. Williams, D. (2017). Richard Branson as a Global Magnate. What to learn from him about Business.